KISHAN CHAND BHARDWAJ Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 12954 and 4 of 1999, and 9585 of 2000 as all the three petitions involve a common question of law, namely, whether the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998 (hereinafter to be referred as ACP Rules), will not apply to a person who had already got any financial upgradation as on 31.12.1995 or to a person who was a promotee. Further question is, whether the provisions of rule 2(2)(h) of the Haryana Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1998 (hereinafter to be referred to Revised Pay Rules) to the extent they result in denial of equal pay to the persons of the same cadre are valid.

(2.) Though facts are identical, but the same, for the purpose of this judgment are being taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 12954 of 1999. The petitioner was appointed on 16.1.1976 and as on 31.12.1997, he was in the pay scale of 4100-5300. The pay scales of the employees of the Haryana Government were revised with effect from 1.1.1996 vide Revised Pay Rules notified on 1.1.1998 which provided the revised pay scales in place of the existing pay scales. Relevant part of the said Rules (sic) rule 2(2)(h) and rule 3(m)(c) and (d) are quoted below :-

(3.) The ACP Rules were also notified on 7.1.1998 which were deemed to have come into force on 1.1.1996. The object of the said Rules was to provide at least two financial upgradation. There were identical provisions prior to the said Rules also. However, under rule 5, it was stated that the benefit of the said scales will be confined to those who had not got financial upgradation as on 31.12.1995 and rule 8(3) provided that those who had already been granted upgradation shall be deemed to have been granted the said upgradation under the ACP Rules. Schedule 1 to the extent relevant is as under :- <FRM>JUDGEMENT_149_LAWS(P&H)11_2001.htm</FRM>