SURINDER KAUR ALIAS CHHINDO Vs. BHAG SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SATWINDER Kaur is the daughter of complainant Bhag Singh and she was married to Amrik Singh on 11-5-1986 at village Sujjon in district Jalandhar. The aforesaid Satwinder Kaur performed her marital obligations but it has been alleged that Amrik Singh and several other members of the family were unhappy because they considered the dowry inadequate. She returned to the house of her parents after five weeks of her marriage.

(2.) ON 23-6-1986 Amrik Singh married Jaswinder Kaur at Meerut before the Marriage Officer and got the aforesaid marriage registered. At the time of the registration of marriage, the other accused such as Jarnail Singh, Manjit Kaur brother and sister of Amrik Singh and Bant Kaur the mother of Amrik Singh and Surinder Kaur were also present. The complainant has further alleged that Jaswinder Kaur accused No. 2 was aware that Amrik Singh was already married to Surinder Kaur who is still alive and that in the second marriage the other co-accused No. 3 to 6 also took active part and on these allegations the complaint under Section 494 of the IPC was instituted. Shri K. K. Lomas, Judicial Magistrate, Nawanshahr after recording the statements of PW 1 Bhag Singh father of the first wife, PW 2 Tirath Singh and PW 3 Tara Singh summoned the accused for the offence under Section 494 of the IPC on 21-11-1988. Aggrieved against this order, present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been moved for quashing the proceedings.

(3.) IT may be specifically mentioned here that Amrik Singh the husband has died on 24-11-1988 in a road accident at Phagwara. This is an admitted fact. Thus, Amrik Singh the husband having died and first wife who herself is living abroad and has not come forward to the Court the present petitions succeed and the proceedings arising out of the complaint instituted by Bhag Singh are hereby quashed.