PARGAN SINGH Vs. SURJIT SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), is directed against the order of the judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kapurthala dated 3-4-1989 whereby the Magistrate himself framed charge under sections 326, 325 and 323 read with section of 34 IPC.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner who incidently is the complainant in this case, is to the effect that the learned Magistrate had no jurisdiction to decide as to whether offence under section 307 or section 307 read with section 34 IPC., exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, was, or was not made out against the accused-respondents, and, it was only the prerogative of the Court of Sessions to decide this question. Only course open for the Magistrate was to commit the case, particularly when the doctor had opined that the head injury coupled with the other injuries could prove dangerous to life of the injured complainant. There is considerable merit in this contention in as much as the Magistrate had no jurisdiction in the instant case to decide as to whether offence under section 307 or section 307 read with section 34 IPC, which is exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, has been made out or not.

(3.) THE Court of Sessions has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 228 of the Code to decide as to whether a case is, or, is not exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, and in the latter case, the trial has to be remitted. back to the Magistrate concerned for trial. Thus, there cannot be two opinions about the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Sessions to decide, as to whether in the instant case particular prima facie offence under section 307 or section 307 read with section 34 IPC had or had not been made out against the accused-respondents.