SHISH PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has impugned the undated order passed by respondent No. 2 removing him from service in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.

(2.) Facts first :

(3.) Respondent No. 2 has controverted the factual averments made in the petition. The only defence taken in the written statement is that the impugned order was passed after taking into consideration the order of the Judicial Magistrate dated 4.6.1984 and of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 12.6.1984.