HARINDERPAL SINGH Vs. PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, petitioners Harinderpal Singh and Sahib Singh have approached this Court for the quashing of admission notice dated 31st August, 1989 (Annexure P-4), issued by the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. in which the petitioners have been refused admission to the B. V. Sc. and A H. Course. The petitioners qualified the 10+2 Examination from the Central Board of\ Secondary Education They participated in the sports and attained cistinctions in the North Zone Sainik Schools Athletics Meet held at Sainik School, Nagrota (Jammu and Kashmir), on 8th and 9th October, 1988, According to the admission rules of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 5 per cent of the seats are reserved for "out standing sportsmen" that is, persons who have participated at the international, national or State level within two years before admission. The relevant provision, as contained, in the Prospectus issued for admission to B. V. Sc. and A. H - 5 Years Programme, is reproduced as under: "10. B. V. Sc. and A. C.-5. Year Programme :

(2.) BOTH the petitioners competed for selection held for the purpose of admission to the Degree Course but failed to make the grade according to the criteria fixed by the University. Aggrieved of that, they have challenged the selection itself on the ground that the petitioners have been wrongly ignored because they have passed out from Sainik Schools and not from Kendriya Vidyalaya and that their grading in the field of sports has not been properly made.

(3.) ON the other hand, the stand taken by the respondent University in their written statement is that the selection for the purposes of admission, especially from amongst 'outstanding sportsmen' has been made meticulously in accordance with the rules of the University and the criteria for selection of 'outstanding sportsmen' is wholly in accordance with law and has also been upheld by this Court. It has further been contended that the allegation that the petitioners were ignored for the purposes of admission on the ground that they happened to pass out from the Sainik Schools and not from Kendriya Vidyalaya is wrong