PARAMJIT KAUR AND ORS Vs. DARSHAN SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Present petition is filed assailing the order dated 18.02.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bathinda, thereby dismissing the application moved by the plaintiff-appellants seeking amendment in the plaint to incorporate Rs. 3 lacs in para No. 4 instead of Rs. 1 lac.

(2.) Undisputedly during the pendency of the original case before the learned Trial Court, the amendment application was moved. Initially, amendment application was dismissed by the learned Trial Court and order of the learned Trial Court was challenged before this Court by way of Civil Revision No. 5391 of 2006, which was allowed vide order dated 20th February, 2007, permitting the plaintiff-appellants to carry out the amendment in para No. 4 of the plaint correcting the figure of Rs. 1 lac as Rs. 3 lacs.

(3.) Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that while filing the amended plaint in compliance with the order of this Court dated 20.02.2007, the learned Counsel for the plaintiffs committed the same mistake and without amending the figure in para No. 4 of the plaint, filed the plaint as it is. The mistake was realized during the pendency of the appeal. The learned Counsel for the petitioners further states that for the lapses on the part of the counsel for the plaintiffs, plaintiffs should not be allowed to suffer and the defendant - respondent could be compensated by way of cost.