LAWS(P&H)-2010-4-120

SUKHPAL KAUR Vs. IMPROVEMENT TRUST

Decided On April 05, 2010
SUKHPAL KAUR Appellant
V/S
IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BATHINDA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of direction to the Land Acquisition Collector, Improvement Trust, Bathinda to redetermine her claim for compensation of her acquired land under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity 'the Act'). It has remained undisputed that land measuring 1 kanal comprised in khasra No. 2387 min, Khewat Khatouni No. 753/3151 was acquired by the Improvement Trust, Bhatinda for 49.57 Acre Scheme. THE award was announced on 29.8.1996. THE petitioner did not file any reference under Section 18 of the Act. However, some other land owners had sought reference under Section 18 of the Act and the Tribunal enhanced the awarded amount vide order dated 11.6.2002.

(2.) THE petitioner is claimed to have filed an application under Section 28 A of the Act on 5.9.2002 before the Land Acquisition Collector for redetermination of her claim at par which those who have been granted enhancement. It is appropriate to mention that the award passed by the Tribunal has been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 3.3.2009 passed in CWP No. 15326 of 2002 (Bhikam Singh and another v. THE District Judge, Bathinda and others) alongwith many other petitions.

(3.) WE have heard learned counsel and are of the view that the writ petition deserves to be allowed. The petitioner is entitled to redetermination of the amount of compensation as enhanced by the Tribunal-cum-District Judge vide order dated 11.6.2002 which has been upheld by this Court in Bhikam Singh's case (supra) as the writ petitions filed by the claimants have been dismissed. It is not required to be emphasized that Section 28 A of the Act confers a right of redetermination on a land owner who has not sought reference under Section 18 of the Act to seek redetermination at par with those who have succeeded in getting the compensation enhanced. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Respondent no.2 is directed to redetermine the amount in accordance with the order dated 11.6.2002 passed by the Land Acquisition Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Bhatinda n which has been upheld by this Court in Bhikam Singh's case (supra) The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.