(1.) This is defendant's revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 19.8.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kaithal vide which the plaintiff-respondents have been permitted to lead evidence in rebuttal which was allegedly not permissible in law.
(2.) As per averments made in this petition, the plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for recovery which was contested by the petitioner. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed:
(3.) Whether this Court has no jurisdiction to try and entertain the present suit OPD