SADHU RAM GUPTA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents f to 3 to treat the petitioners on deputation and to allow deputation allowance.

(2.) It was pleaded that petitioners had to undergo financial losses. Petitioner No. 1 applied for Leave Travel Concession to respondent No. 1 and he (petitioner No. 1) was asked to approach the parent department. The parent department also declined the request of the petitioner for the grant of Leave Travel Concession on the ground for the grant of Leave Travel Concession on ground that he was not on the Establishment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court at the relevant time and was on deputation. The State of Punjab through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice informed Justice Pattar vide D.O. Letter No. 32/3/81 -4H(II)/6120 dated 8.4.1983 that the staff attached to him cannot be granted the deputation allowance.

(3.) Petitioners have prayed that the order of respondent No. 1 is illegal, unconstitutional and contrary to the undertaking given by respondents 1 & 2.