GUBHAJAN SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 9.7.1994 vide which the disability pension of the petitioner was dis-continued w.e.f. 8.4.1988. The petitioner has further prayed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant him the disability pension along with interest.

(2.) The case set up by the petitioner is that he joined the Army on 8.5.1968. On 22.4.1972, he was boarded out on medical ground with more than 20% disability and he was awarded temporary disability pension. In the year 1978, the last re-survey medical board was held at Military Hospital, Ambala Cantt., and the petitioner was informed by the Medical Authority that his disability had been assessed at about 20% for life and, thereafter, he was never advised to be present before re-survey medical board. The petitioner had been getting the pension upto Dec., 1993. However, the pension of the petitioner was discontinued with effect from Jan., 1994. The petitioner made a representation before the authorities and he was informed vide letter dated 9.7.1994 that his pension has been discontinued w.e.f. 8.4.1988. The petitioner made another representation on 15.2.1997 but he was informed vide letter dated 27.5.1997 that since he had not submitted any appeal against the decision, so no action can be taken at that stage.

(3.) Notice of the writ petition was given to the respondents who filed the reply and submitted that the petitioner was enrolled in the Regiment of Artillery on 8.5.1968 and was invalided out of service due to disease "Sciatica Syndrome (RT) - 353" w.e.f. 22.6.1972. He was brought before the Invaliding Medical Board on 18.3.1972. The duly constituted medical board viewed that the invaliding disease was aggravated by military service due to stress and climatic conditions of service and assessed the degree of disablement at less than 20%, i.e. 15 to 19%, for two years. Disability pension claim was sent to the Chief Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Allahabad, for their adjudication and they accepted the disability of the petitioner at 20% and granted disability pension w.e.f. 22.6.1972 vide pension payment order No. D/5430/72 dated 1.9.1972, for (sic) years. On subsequent review, disability of the petitioner was assessed at 20% and he was granted disability pension up to 7.4.1988. The petitioner was again brought before the Re-survey Medical Board on 27.2.1988 and his disability was again assessed at 20% by the Medical Board. The re-assessed disability pension claim was forwarded to the Chief Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Allahabad, on 24.5.1988 but the claim was rejected as the disability was less that 20%. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to the disability pension w.e.f. 8.7.1988.