GURDEV SINGH Vs. HARDEV SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS regular second appeal is directed against the judgment of the first Appellate Court dated 29.3.2000 affirming the findings in relation to fact and law both.

(2.) IN order to show that the present appeal involves substantial questions of law, justifying admission of this appeal, learned counsel for the appellant contended :-

(3.) AT the very outset I must notice that none of the above said contentions are founded on the pleadings raised by the appellant in the written statement filed in the trial Court. In paragraph No. 5 of the preliminary objections taken in the written statement, it has been stated that the plaint is vague and the plaintiff has no cause of action. The written statement runs into three pages and the entire case of the defendant-appellant is pleaded in paragraph No. 1, where it is stated as under :-