BANSI LAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CH . Bansi Lal, M.L.A. has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction against the respondents and has prayed that the order dated 16.3.2000 (Annexure P4), letter dated 2.5.2000 (Annexure P4), letter dated 2.5.2000 (Annexure P3) be quashed and directions be given to the State of Haryana to release him the medical reimbursement to the tune of Rs. 1,24,246/ -.

(2.) THE case set up by the petitioner is that on 9.7.1991 he was elected as Member of Haryana Legislative Assembly and remained as such upto 10.5.1996. Again he was elected as M.L.A. on 11.5.1996 and remained as such upto 22.2.2000. Thereafter he was again elected as M.L.A. on 25.2.2000 and is commuting as such. According to him, on 27.10.1999 he undertook cardiac treatment and bye -pass surgery in All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi where he remained admitted upto 13.11.1999 and incurred medical expenses to the rune of Rs. 1,24,246/ -. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences also issued Essentially Certificate dated 16.11.1999 to the effect that medical expenses were actually incurred by the petitioner. On 20.11.1999 he submitted his medical bills for reimbursement to the Speaker of Haryana Vidhan Sabha, Chandigarh, but vide letter dated 2.5.2000, addressed to him, his medical claim was declined on the plea that he is Ex -member of Parliament. Again on 16.3.2000 his claim was declined by respondent No. 1 on the ground that he being an Ex -Member of Parliament was eligible to get free treatment from the said institute and as such there was no question of claiming medical reimbursement from the Haryana Government. His medical bill was returned in original. In short, the case of the petitioner is that since he had been M.L.A. before his treatment, during the period of treatment and even after the treatment and is still continuing as such, therefore, he has the right to claim medical reimbursement from the Haryana Government and the action of the respondents is mala fide, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

(3.) I have heard Mr. H.S. Hooda, Sr. Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Surya Kant, Advocate General, Haryana and with their assistance have gone through the record of this case.