RAI SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE application of respondents No. 5 to 7 for shifting of their land from Outlet No. RD 72000-R to Outlet No. RD 74000-R for irrigation has been accepted by the competent authority. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner has approached this Court through the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

(2.) MR . Sanjeev Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner contends that the orders passed by the authorities are not in conformity with law. Thus, these should be quashed. The claim made on behalf of the petitioner has been controverted by the counsel for the respondents.

(3.) MR . Gupta contends that the Chief Canal Officer has accepted the appeal without assigning any reason.