REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ABDUL MAZID Appellant

V/S

Burhanuddin Ahmed Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MAGOO BRAHMA V. BALKRISHNA DAS [REFERRED TO]
BABURAM BEG V. MOHADEB CHANDRA PALLAY [REFERRED TO]
CHARLES OSENTON AND CO. V. JOHNSTON [REFERRED TO]
EVANS V. BARTLAM [REFERRED TO]
NOOR ZABUR MIAN V. ISLAM MIAN [REFERRED TO]
TAYLOR V. STIBBERT [REFERRED TO]
FAKI IBRAHIM V. FAKI GULAIN MOHIDIN [REFERRED TO]
KANSHI RAM V. ISHWARDAS [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL BANK OF AUSTRALIA V. PAUL HAMILTON JOSEPH [REFERRED TO]
TILOKE CHAND SURANA V. J.B. BEATTIE AND CO. [REFERRED TO]
UTTAR PRADESH CO OPERATIVE FEDERATION LIMITED VS. SUNDER BROS DELHI [REFERRED TO]
DELHI MOTOR CO VS. U A BASRURKAR DEAD [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. SHAMLAL MURARI [REFERRED TO]
SUKHAD RAJ SINGH VS. RAM HARSH MISRA [REFERRED TO]
MYSORE STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION STATE OF MYSORE VS. MIRJA KHASIM ALI BEG:S M AHMED [REFERRED TO]
DURGA PRASAD VS. LILAWATI [REFERRED TO]
YENUGU ACHAYYA VS. ERNAKI VENKATA SUBBA RAO [REFERRED TO]
DHADI DALAI VS. BASUDEB SATPATHY [REFERRED TO]
CHINNA THEVAR VS. GNANAPRAKASI AMMAL [REFERRED TO]
RAMCHANDER SINGH VS. BIBI ASGHARI BEGAM [REFERRED TO]
BASRUDDIN KHAN VS. GURUDARSHAN DAS [REFERRED TO]
SHANKARLAL NARAYANDAS MUNDADE VS. NEW MOFUSSIL CO LTD [REFERRED TO]
BHUP NARAIN SINGH VS. GOKUL CHAND MAHTON [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD ASTAM KHAN VS. FEROZE SHAH [REFERRED TO]
HARENDRA CHANDRA DAS VS. NANDA LAL ROY [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS plaintiff's first appeal is from the judgement and decree dated 12-6-70 and 25-6-70 respectively, of the Assistant District Judge, Nowgong, in Title Suit No. 26 of 1967, partly decreeing the suit against respondent No. 1 and dismissing the suit against respondents Nos. 2 and 3. The facts of the case, in brief are as follows :

(2.) THUS while the plaintiff claims specific performance of an agreement dated 30-12-64 to sell the property to him, the defendants Nos. 2 and 8 claimed by a registered deed of purchase dated 16-3-65 pursuant to an agreement to sell dated 7-1-65.

(3.) ISSUES Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were decided in favour of the plaintiff while Issues Nos. 6, 7 and 8 were decided in favour of the defendants and the suit was dismissed against defendants Nos. 2 and 3 but decreed against defendant No. 1 for Rupees 5,000/- with proportionate cost on contest. Hence this, first appeal.

Click here to view full judgment.

ABDUL MAZID Vs. BURHANUDDIN AHMED

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address