LAWS(GAU)-2009-4-20

NOOR AHMED BORBHUYAN Vs. STATE OF ASSAM

Decided On April 07, 2009
Noor Ahmed Borbhuyan Appellant
V/S
STATE OF ASSAM Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellants being aggrieved by their conviction under Sections 148/149/323/325/302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short hereafter referred to as the Code as well) and sentences awarded correspondingly ranging from rigorous imprisonment for six months till life and fine from Rs. 500/- to Rs. 5000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for varying periods as referred to in the impugned judgment and order dated 9. 9. 2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge , Hailakandi, Assam, in Sessions Case No. 21/2000 are in appeal for redress.

(2.) WE have heard Mr. J. M. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. B. M. Choudhury, Advocate for the appellants and Mr. K. C. Mahanta, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam.

(3.) ON the said information Katlicherra P. S. Case No. 77/94 under Sections 147/148/149/447/325/326/307 of the Code was registered and on completion of the investigation, charge sheet was laid against the accused appellants and eight others. All the charge sheeted accused persons having been committed to the Court of Sessions for trial, charges with different heads against them were framed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hailakandi, on 18. 2. 2000. To be specific, the learned Court below arraigned the accused persons under Sections 148/149/323/325/302 of the Code. The charges having been denied on being explained to the accused persons, the prosecution took to trial in course of which it examined 13 witnesses. A number of documents were also exhibited. The statements of the accused persons were thereafter recorded under Section 313 of the Code. They, however, declined to adduce evidence in defence.