REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Rajkumar Manisana Singh Appellant

V/S

Nameirakpam Angou Singh Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

EMPEROR V. MENGHRAJ DEVIDAG [REFERRED TO]
PONUSWAMI ODAYAR V. RANASWATNI THATHAN [REFERRED TO]
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR V. A. V. RAMIAH [REFERRED TO]
KANAI HIZRA V. GOLAP HIZRA [REFERRED TO]
RASIK TATMA V. BHAGWAT TANTI [REFERRED TO]
DATTU PANT V. ADVYA CHARI [REFERRED TO]
KALIAPPAN V. KALIAPPAN [REFERRED TO]
STATE V. CHAND MEAH [REFERRED TO]
JAGANNATH RAO DANI V. EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]
PRITAM SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
HARBHAJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
JAI PRAKASH VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
KUPPAGIRI ATCHAMMA VS. JAKKI REDDI KOTI REDDI [REFERRED TO]
PARISA RAGHAVULU VS. BORRA KOTAYYA [REFERRED TO]
THADI NARAYANA VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
K VIDYANAND VS. ERRAMMA [REFERRED TO]
DASARATH SINGH VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
FULA BEWA VS. BANAMALI DAS [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. KULDIP SINGH SOHAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
ALI BUX VS. EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]
THINGUJAM TONA SINGH VS. PUYAM GULAP SINGH [REFERRED TO]
INDRA DEVI VS. DIL SUKH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal filed under Section 417(C), Criminal P.C., by the complainant in Criminal Case No. 1 of 1962 on the file of the Magistrate Second Class (Transport), Manipur, against the acquittal of the first respondent for an offence under Sections 126 and 127 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

(2.) THE case of the appellant is that he is the owner of Motor Vehicle Jeep No. MNS, 1368, that on 18 -6 -1961 it was hired by the Police to take some Police personnel to Khoubum camp from Imphal, that the driver M. Ibungohal Singh, was accompanied by a conductor Kh. Senapati Singh, that the jeep reached Khoubum on 18 -6 1961, that in the morning of 19 -6 -1961 when the driver and the conductor were taking tea at a canteen, the first respondent who is a Police Officer, entered into it and drove it, that he damaged the gear box and different parts of the jeep in such a way that it became unfit for use and that after repairing the Vehicle at a cost of about Rs. 1,000 the Vehicle was brought back to the complainant appellant on 2 -7.1961. It is also the case of the appellant that on 28 -6.1961, the matter was reported to the Superintendent of Police, Imphal, that on 14 -8 -1961 the drives lodged a complaint is Criminal Case No. 1 of 1961 before the Transport Magistrate but that the 1st respondent was 'discharged' on 15.8 -1962 due to the absence of both the parties. The appellant filed Criminal Case No. 1 of 1962 on 14 -4 -1962 against the first respondent under Sections 126 and 127 of the Motor Vehicles Act and against M. Ibungobal Singh under Sections 426, 84 and 109, I.P.C.

(3.) THE points which were argued and which arise for determination are:

Click here to view full judgment.

RAJKUMAR MANISANA SINGH Vs. NAMEIRAKPAM ANGOU SINGH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address