(1.) This writ petition involves the interpretation of matters relating to the United Khasi and Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment & Succession of Chief and Headmen) Act, 1959.
(2.) The brief facts of the case are summed up as below:
(3.) The respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 entered appearance and submitted its affidavit and stated that the petitioner was no doubt a headman who is appointed only for a pen J of one year and in support of the aforesaid statement the respondent referred a communication of the petitioner dated 7th June, 1993. The appointment of the petitioner according to the District Council was also confirmed by the pro forma respondent No. 5 for a period of one year along with other office bearers. In the affidavit respondent Nos. 1 to 3 also mentioned some of the misconduct of the petitioner. From the document which is placed before me by the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in its affidavit, it appears that respondent No. 3 advised pro forma respondent No. 5 the Chief of the Elaka to meet the executive member on 1 -2-96 at 11 am positively for interrogation and discussion on the matter by its letter dated 22-1-96 and thereafter on 1-2-96 the statement of the Dolloi in the meeting with Executive member in charge were recorded and the same was signed by the respondent No. 5 pro forma respondent. The same statement is extracted as below:--