(1.) THIS appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24.12.2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kokrajhar, in Title Appeal No.9/1999, dismissing the same by affirming the judgment and decree dated 06.09.1997 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.2, Kokrajhar, in Title Suit No.47/1988.
(2.) THE predecessor -in -interest of the present respondents instituted Title Suit No.47/1987 for declaration of right, title, interest and permanent injunction in respect of a plot of land measuring 3 lechas covered by Dag No.216 of Khatian No.64, more fully described in the Schedule -A to the plaint, contending inter alia that the said land though originally belonged to him, was subsequently transferred in favour of one Rajendra Barman by a registered deed of sale dated 11.03.1970, who on 18.03.1986 retransferred the right, title and interest in respect of the said land in favour of the plaintiff by a registered deed of sale dated 18.03.1986 (Ext. -1) and delivered the possession. It has also been contended that on the southern part of the land, i.e. 1 1/2 lechas, more fully described in Schedule -B to the plaint, which was let out to one Nirmal Biswas, a cycle maker, the defendant started disturbing the possession of the plaintiff, which is part of the Schedule -A land, on the guise of alleged sale by Rajendra Barman to the defendant on 28.07.1987 (Ext. -B), compelling the plaintiff to file the suit as aforesaid.
(3.) BASED on the pleadings of the parties, the Trial Court framed the following issues for determination: -