SUDHIR CHANDRA DEBBARMA Vs. STATE OF TRIPURA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. P. Roy Baman, learned Counsel for the Petitioner as well as Ms A.S. Lodh, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State Respondents.

(2.) BY means of this writ petition, the Petitioner has questioned the memorandum dated 1 -6 -2000 by which he was released from service with effect from 31 -5 -2000. As indicated in the order he had attained the age of superannuation at 58 years as on 22 -6 -99 and thus he overstayed in service. It is on that ground the order for recovery of the salary the Petitioner had drawn by virtue of his overstaying in service was also passed. As per the order for recovery the amount to be recovered is Rs. 63,021/ -.

(3.) WHILE entertaining the writ petition by order dated 6 -12 -2000 an interim order was passed allowing the deduction of Rs. 30,000/ - subject to decision in the writ petition.