MD. WAJID ALI Vs. MUNLANA NARUL HAQUE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision petition arises from an order dated 8.9.88 passed by the Sessions judge Karimganj in Criminal Motion No 9(2) of 1988 dismissing the revision petition against the order dated 8.4.88 of the Sub -Divisional Magistrate, Karimganj made in Case No. 355m of 1984 deciding the possession of the disputed land under Section 145, Code of Criminal Procedure in favour of the Respondent.

(2.) SRI A.B. Choudhury, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner has contended that the Petitioner has title to the land in dispute and, therefore, be has the right to possess the subject of dispute.

(3.) THE judgments of the Courts below show that there is a clear finding of the Magistrate that the Respondent was in actual possession of the subject in dispute. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere with the judgments of the Courts below. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Stay order stands vacated. The aggrieved party may approach the Civil Court for his remedy, if so advised.