YENGKHOM SURCHANDRA SINGH Vs. MAYANGLAMBAM RAMESHWAR SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) In these petitions, the applicant sought to hold an enquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C. against the election petitioner on. the allegation that he had committed the crime punishable under Sections 193, 199, 200, 209 and 471 IPC for forging and fabricating Ex.P5 and to stay the further proceedings of the Election Petition till the disposal of the application for holding enquiry.

(3.) While deciding the main Election Petition, this Court finds that Ex.P5 is genuine and no forgery and/or fabrication has been proved by the applicant. Further, before claiming that Ex.P5 is a forged one, the applicant has to produce their original or certified copy of the same. Without producing the original or certified copy of the said document, how the applicant claimed that Ex.P5 is a forged document. Moreover, there is no plea in respect of forgery m the written statement filed by the applicant in the main Election Petition.