(1.) Plaintiff No.3 is the appellant against a confirming judgment in a suit for partition.
(2.) The following genealogy would show the relationship of the parties.
(3.) Defendant filed a written statement denying the assertions made in the plaint. Case of the defendant is that Narayan was the common ancestor of the parties. After his death, the suit land was recorded jointly in the names of six brothers in the 2nd settlement. Kanhei and Laxman separated. Their share of land was recorded in Khata No.10 during 3rd settlement in the name of Kalia the son of Kanhei. The rest of the lands were recorded in the name of Nata under Khata No.11 in 3rd settlement.