(1.) The 2nd appeal has been preferred against the reversing judgment.
(2.) The appellant of this 2nd appeal was the sole plaintiff before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.94 of 2002 and he was the respondent no.1 before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide R.F.A. No.72 of 2002.
(3.) The respondents of this 2nd appeal were the defendants before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.94 of 2002 and they were the appellants and respondent nos.2 and 3 before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide R.F.A. No.72 of 2002.