(1.) This 2nd appeal has been preferred against the reversing judgment.
(2.) The respondent of this 2nd appeal was the sole plaintiff before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.03 of 1988 and he was the appellant before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide T.A. No.29 of 1990.
(3.) The appellants of this 2nd appeal were the defendants before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.03 of 1988 and they were the respondents in the 1st appeal before the 1st appellate court in T.A. No.29 of 1990.