DILLIP KUMAR MOHAPATRA Vs. STATE OF ODISHA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is a practising Advocate. He is neither litigation minded, nor litigation is his pursuit or hobby. The lackadaisical attitude exhibited by the opposite parties in not carrying out the directions of the Hon'ble apex Court passed in W.P.(C) No.196 of 2001 (People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India and others) and implementing the Mid Day Meal Programme (hereinafter referred to as "MDM Programme") under Supplementary Nutrition Programme Scheme (hereinafter referred to as "SNP Scheme") as per the guideline of the Central Government and not taking any steps for supply of pure drinking water to 9543 numbers of Anganwadi Centres (hereinafter referred to as "AW Cs") and Schools compelled him to approach the portal of this Court as a last resort.

(2.) THE case of the petitioner is that keeping in view of the fact that 57% of the population of India spent Rs.12/ - per day and the child mortality is 61% and large number of children upto the age of 14 years suffering from malnutrition and hunger do not go to school, dropout in the middle of the session, the Central Government introduced the Integrated Child Development Scheme (hereinafter referred to as "ICDS") and MDM Programme so that the children upto the age of 6 years, adolescent girl, pregnant women and nursing mother get the benefit of the ICDS Scheme and the school going children upto primary and upper primary school level get the benefit of MDM scheme. The object of the said scheme is to provide nutritious food to the children coming to the AW Cs, primary and upper primary schools. In order to prevent malnutrition, the Central Government implemented the MDM Programme under the SNP Scheme throughout the State of Orissa in primary schools, upper primary schools, AW Cs to achieve social objective of eradication of illiteracy, check drop out and provide nutritious food at the level of primary, upper primary schools and AW Cs. The Anganwadi Workers of different AW Cs provide health services including health check up for children under 6 years, antenatal care of expected mothers, postnatal care of nursing mothers and treatment of minor ailments. Under the Scheme, the AW Cs supply nutritious foods to the children, adolescent girl, pregnant women for 300 days in a year. Since the implementation of the MDM Programme in the primary schools, upper primary schools and AW Cs in the State of Orissa, several complaints/irregularities were reported in various news papers pertaining to supply of rotten, insect infested substandard dal and other substandard mid day meal ingredients to various schools and AW Cs of KBK districts and other backward districts. There were also some complaints regarding non -supply of rice, dal, soya chunk to various schools under the MDM Programme. The minor children were admitted to hospitals after taking rotten, insect infested dal in the mid day meal. But the State Government had not taken any action. The contractors were allowed to supply substandard low quality dal and soya chunk to the schools. In order to check the malnutrition and effective implementation of the various schemes and for efficient and effective implementation of Supplementary Nutrition Programme, the apex Court by order dated 13.12.2006 had issued directions in W.P.(C) No.196 of 2001, reported in (2007) 1 SCC 719 to the Chief Secretaries of all the State Governments/Union Territories to submit affidavits with details of all habitations with a majority of SC/ST households, the availability of AW Cs in those habitations and the action plan for ensuring that all the habitations are functioning AW Cs within two years. The Chief Secretaries of all the State Governments/UTs were also directed to file affidavits giving details of the steps that had taken with regard to the order of the Court dated 7.10.2004 that the contractors shall not be used for supply of nutrition in AW Cs and preferably ICDS funds shall be spent by making use of village communities, self -help groups and Mahila mandals for buying of grains and preparation of meal. In spite of the aforesaid directions of the apex Court, the State Government and Collectors of different districts are still using contractors for supply of nutritions in Anganwadis. The Central Government, taking into consideration all aspects, approved the revised cost norms under Supplementary Nutrition Programme. Thereafter, the State of Orissa in the Women and Child Development Department issued a circular dated 3.9.2009 revising the norms for supplementary nutrition in ICDS. The same was contrary to the direction of the apex Court. The said guideline envisages the modality for implementation of the programme. It was clearly directed that any supply contractors for dal and other ingredients, i.e., vegetable, soya chunks, rice, etc. which were decided at the district level should only be executed for a period of six months. The Collectors of the districts were directed to initiate fresh tender process accordingly for a period of six months. The supply of substandard dal in the MDM Programme was reported in Electronic/Print Media. On 20.1.2011, the State Vigilance conducted raids in different places and detected large scale irregularities in supply of dal under the mid day meal scheme and Supplementary Nutrition Programme. The raids were also conducted in the office of suppliers of dal in Baramunda colony at Bhubaneswar. In the meeting held on 10th November, 2010 headed by the Chief Secretary, it was decided to procure Kandula dal from the women self help groups of five KBK districts. But the opposite party no.3 maintained a sphinx -like silence. The opposite party no.3 was also aware about supply of such low quality insect infested dal to various schools and AW Cs. The further case of the petitioner is that there are at present 42104 numbers of primary schools, 11510 numbers of upper primary schools, total 53614 schools and 34492 numbers of AW Cs in the State. In almost all the schools and AW Cs, the substandard insect infested, rotten, bacteria contaminated dal are being supplied by the contractors. The same are cooked and served to the minor children. The Vigilance Department has only lodged the FIRs, but no action whatsoever has been taken against the accused persons. It is further stated that out of total numbers of 34492 AW Cs, conditions of only 4293 buildings are in good condition, 1639 AW Cs beyond repairing condition, 4819 require major repairing and 5023 require minor repairing. There is no toilet in 19643 AW Cs. No drinking water facility is available in 9543 AW Cs, no kitchen in 18836 AW Cs, no store room in 19328 AW Cs. Pure drinking water is not available in most of the Centres. It is further stated that in most of the remote villages, without implementing MDM Programme, false bills were prepared in the name of fake/non -existing beneficiaries and public money was siphoned off. It is further stated that the Controller and Auditor General of India submitted a report for the year March, 2012 which was presented before the Orissa Legislative Assembly. The said report reveals that no annual household survey was carried out for assessment of the actual number of beneficiaries. The projected figure includes 3.66 lakh non -existent beneficiaries detected by Department during 2010 -11. Fixation of ceiling price of Rs.75 per kg. of Arhar Dal as against the existing system of bidding/tender process prescribed in the rules and even quoting this ceiling as the rate in tenders led to loss of Rs.43.61 crores in 30 districts during April, 2010 to March, 2011. It was also found that the ceiling price was much higher than the whole price of Arhar Dal. Tenders were finalized without conducting the prescribed quality tests. Several other irregularities were also pointed out. It is further stated that one M/s.Puja Enterprises, Bhubaneswar was debarred from participating in any tender in the district of Dhenkanal by the Collector, Dhenkanal, but the said firm was engaged as a contractor in many districts. Undue favour had been shown by the State functionaries to the contractors/suppliers for supply of dal.

(3.) SPATE of orders had been passed by this Court from time to time, pursuant to which, 14 numbers of affidavits had been filed by the opposite parties at different point of time including the Vigilance Department. But then a comprehensive counter affidavit was filed by the opposite party nos.1 and 3 on 18.7.2011. Since the stand of opposite parties is same, we refer to the counter affidavit dated 18.7.2011 filed by the opposite party nos.1 and 3. Additionally we refer to the affidavits dated 5.7.2011 and 10.07.2014 filed by the Principal Secretary and Additional Secretary to the Government, Rural Development Department respectively.