LAWS(ORI)-1973-5-9

GOSWAMI PRESS CUTTACK Vs. STATE OF ORISSA

Decided On May 03, 1973
GOSWAMI PRESS CUTTACK Appellant
V/S
STATE OF ORISSA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY order dated 9th November, 1970, made under section 24 (3) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act), this court called upon the Sales Tax Tribunal to refer the following two questions for determination of this court :

(2.) AS directed the Tribunal forwarded a statement of facts dated 8th February, 1971. When the case came up for hearing before us on 14th August, 1972, the statement of facts was found to be inadequate and appeared to be too bald and cryptic. Accordingly, we called for a supplementary statement which has in the meantime been received. In fact, as indicated by us in our order dated 14th August, 1972, the Tribunal has now returned a consolidated statement of facts.

(3.) FOR the year 1965-66, the assessee returned a gross turnover of Rs. 3,91,263. 75 and taxable turnover of Rs. 1,17,202. 24. In the taxable turnover was included the sale price of paper to the tune of Rs. 34,061. 12. The assessing officer excluded from the gross turnover returned by the assessee the printing charges which represented payment for labour only and by that process arrived at a gross turnover of Rs. 1,23,205. 59. The assessing officer proceeded to determine the taxable turnover thereafter. During the year, the dealer had purchased paper worth Rs. 36,016. 08 free of tax on the strength of its registration certificate by furnishing the requisite declaration that the paper purchased was meant to be resold within Orissa. The assessing officer found that out of this purchase of paper, the assessee had sold paper to the tune of Rs. 34,061. 12 to the customers. He obviously was of the view that there was indeed no sale of paper as such. The assessee after procuring orders for printing had utilised paper to the tune of Rs. 34,061. 12 in executing the orders for printing. After deducting 10 per cent estimated profit, he came to hold that for violation of the proviso to section 5 (2) (A) (a) (ii) of the Act, a sum of Rs. 30,655. 02 was to be added to the taxable turnover. Accordingly, he directed that amount to be so added. Consequently, the taxable turnover was enhanced to Rs. 1,47,857. 26, which was in excess of the gross turnover determined to the tune of about Rs. 25,000.