(1.) THE question referred by the Sales Tax Tribunal under section 24(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, in each of these S.J.Cs. analogously heard is this :
(2.) SECTION 21 of the Act under which the assessee-dealer had applied for summoning of the said two retailers, so far as material is this :
(3.) THE rival contentions are as follows : The assessee-dealer's points are these : The materials recovered by seizure of the books of accounts of the said two retailers are not admissible against the assessee-dealer inasmuch as the assessee-dealer was not given full opportunity to meet the case against him on the basis of such materials. The assessee-dealer's point is that he was not given a chance to confront the said two retailers one of whom was examined in his absence and other was not examined at all, and thus, according to the assessee-dealer, there was denial of natural justice. The department's case, on the other hand, is that the assessing officers were not bound to accede to the request of the assessee-dealer to bring the persons from whom information regarding suppression of accounts is gathered, and to examine them in the presence of the assessee-dealer. The department's point is that the assessee-dealer cannot ask for this as of right.