(1.) This Appeal has been preferred by the Appellants against the reversing judgment.
(2.) The Appellants were the defendant Nos.1 to 5 in the suit vide T.S. No.34 of 1991 and they were the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.10 of 1994.
(3.) The suit vide T.S. No.34 of 1991 of the plaintiffs was a suit for declaration.