(1.) The appellants Anil Kujur and Rantho Tanty @ Jayapuria faced trial in the Court of learned 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sundargarh in Sessions Trial No.24/111 of 2004 for commission of offences under Sec. 302/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter 'I.P.C.') on the accusation that on 9/11/2003 at about 10.00 p.m. in village Bhagatpada, Kansabahal, they committed murder of one Bhaja Kindo (hereinafter 'the deceased') and threw his dead body on the railway track in order to cause disappearance of the evidence in furtherance of their common intention. The learned trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dtd. 31/3/2005 found both the appellants guilty under the aforesaid charges and sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. Prosecution Case:
(2.) The prosecution case, as per the first information report (hereinafter 'F.I.R.') presented by Rama Kindo (P.W.6) before the Officer in-charge of Kansabahal Out Post, Kansbahal on 24/11/2003, is that on 9/11/2003 at about 10.00 p.m., the deceased who was his younger brother came on a bicycle along with the appellants to his house and asked his sister to give him Rs.10.00 (rupees ten), but the sister of the deceased refused to pay the money, for which all of them went to the house of a neighbour, namely, Jeera Lakra (P.W.5) and thereafter they went away. It is stated that the deceased was a cowman and he was staying in the house of Terenga Kindo (P.W.7) in village Dipatoli and occasionally he was visiting his own house. On the next day, the deceased did not come to his house. The informant and his family members remained under an impression that the deceased might have gone to the house of P.W.7 for which they did not search for him. On 10/11/2003, one naked dead body of a person was found on the railway track near Kansabahal by the G.R.P.S., Rourkela police and they registered U.D. case no.37 of 2003 and seized the body and sent it for post mortem examination. On 12/11/2003, some local boys while tending cows found the cycle of P.W.7 lying in a nala and they kept it in the house of one Golta Bada. Hearing about the recovery of the cycle, P.W.7 came to the house of Golta Bada and indentified his cycle which the deceased had taken with him while leaving his house. P.W.7 along with P.W.6 came to G.R.P.S., Rourkela where they identified the photographs of the dead body as that of the deceased and ascertained further that the dead body had been sent for post mortem examination. Thereafter, P.W.6 came back to his village with P.W.7 and disclosed about the matter before others. The appellants being confronted confessed that after consuming liquor, they had committed murder of the deceased by strangulating his neck and laid the dead body between the railway tracks near Kansabahal and also concealed the wearing apparels of the deceased. It is further stated that the villagers were calling the mother of the informant as 'witch' and threatening her and abusing her in case any villager was falling ill. The written report presented by P.W.6 was sent to the Inspector in-charge of Rajgangpur police station for registration of the case and accordingly, the Inspector in-charge of Rajgangpur police station registered Rajgangpur P.S. Case No.167 dtd. 24/11/2003 under Sec. 302/201/34 of I.P.C. and directed the Sub-Inspector in-charge of Kansabahal Out Post, namely, Mayadhar Rout (P.W.10) to take up investigation, who had already taken up preliminary steps of investigation. During the course of investigation, P.W.10 examined the informant (P.W.6) as well as other witnesses, visited the spot, prepared the spot map (Ext.11) and seized an old Avon cycle from the house of Golta Bada as per seizure list Ext.12 and also collected the relevant documents concerning the connected U.D. Case No.37 of 2003 of G.R.P.S., Rourkela. P.W.10 arrested the appellants on 26/11/2003 and while in custody of police, they confessed their guilt and after recording of the statements of the appellants under Sec. 27 of the Evidence Act, the wearing apparels of the deceased and the stones (weapons of offence) were seized from the place of concealment at the instance of the appellants. The I.O. (P.W.10) also seized the wearing apparels of the appellants as per seizure list Ext.15. He also issued requisition for collection of the blood sample and nail clippings of both the appellants on 27/11/2003 and on production by constable A. Prahan, he seized the same as per seizure list Ext.16. On 2/12/2003, P.W.10 gave the seized cycle in the zima of P.W.7 by executing zimanama and the seized articles were kept in Malkhana of Rajgangpur police station and a request was made to the J.M.F.C., Rajgangpur to send the seized exhibits for chemical examination. P.W.10 received the chemical examination report dtd. 30/4/2004 issued by the Director, S.F.S.L., Bhubaneswar and on completion of investigation, he submitted charge sheet under Sec. 302/201/34 of the I.P.C. against the appellants. Framing of Charges:
(3.) After submission of charge sheet, the case was committed to the Court of Session for trial after observing due committal procedure where the learned trial Court charged the appellants under Sec. 302/34 and 201/34 of the I.P.C. on 28/9/2004 and since the appellants refuted the charges, pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried, the sessions trial procedure was resorted to prosecute them and establish their guilt. Prosecution Witnesses & Documents Exhibited Bv Prosecution: