(1.) THE order of acquittal under Section 255(1), Cr.P.C. in 3(a) C. C. Case No. 328 of 1986 of the Court of Judicial Magistrate Second Class, Berhampur, as per the impugned judgment dated 13.5.1987, is under challenge.
(2.) RESPONDENT faced the said trial for the offence under Section 385 -A of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 (in short, 'the Act'), on the allegation that in contravention of the provision in Section 264 read with Section 266 of the Act he was continuing with construction of a house unauthorisedly in Ward No. 18 of Berhampur Municipality. The defence taken by the respondent was a plea of complete denial with the assertion that his house is 10 years old by the date of prosecution.
(3.) THE trial Court found the evidence tendered by the prosecution to be deficient to prove that a house was being constructed by the respondent in contravention of the aforesaid provision of law constituting the offence under Section 385 -A of the Act, inasmuch as both the prosecution witnesses could not state the plot/survey number and there was nothing in their evidence to show or suggest that the respondent was continuing with any construction.