LAWS(ORI)-2001-11-4

R SRINIBAS PATTNAIK Vs. REGISTRAR DISTRICT AND SESSIONS

Decided On November 13, 2001
R Srinibas Pattnaik Appellant
V/S
Registrar District And Sessions Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this writ petition the petitioner prays for a direction to the opposite parties to appoint him against the vacant post or junior clerk under the judgeship of the District Judge, Koraput.

(2.) Briefly stated, his case is that the District Judge, Koraput, Jeypore made an advertisement dated 14.8.1992 inviting applications from eligible candidates for filling up of posts of Junior Clerk. Persuant to the said advertisement, he applied, qualified himself in the written test and thereafter appeared in the viva-voce test. He became successful and his position was at serial no. 52 of the panel list published on 13.10.1992 at Annexure - 4. One Pradeep Kumar Bal filed a writ petition bearing O.J.C.No 2466 of 1995 alleging that although his position in the panel list was at 25the, instead of appointing him the District Judge was going ahead to recruit fresh candidates. By order dated 10.8.1995 this Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction that "no fresh general candidate will be appointed to the post of Junior Clerk till to present list of October, 1993 is exhausted "and" the order given in the list will be followed while issuing appointment orders." As he (Petitioner of O.J.C.No. 2466/1995 ) was not appointed, he again moved this Court in Misc. Case No. 3767 of 1997 for issuance of appropriate direction. This Court by order dated 16.7.1997 disposed of the said misc.case with a direction that the next vacancy would go to him because the candidate occupying 34th position in the list had been given appointment.

(3.) Basing on the Judgment dated 14.11.1996 in another case (OJC No. 632 of 1996) Registrar of this Court issued instructions to all the District and Sessions Judges stating that no appointment shall be made from the waiting list prepared and if necessary fresh list be prepared by the District Judge in accordance with law. Later the Registrar modified the aforesaid letter on 9.9.1998 stating as follows :