LAWS(CAL)-1999-2-50

SANJAY SINHA Vs. SRI PINAKI CHAUDHURY

Decided On February 15, 1999
SANJAY SINHA Appellant
V/S
Sri Pinaki Chaudhury Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In these two applications, one filed under section 11 and the other under Sections 8 and 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions, one for reference of disputes to the Arbitrator and the other for interim relief. It is the admitted case of the petitioner that with respect to the subject matter of these two petitions, a Suit is pending in Court of the 2nd Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Alipore 24-Paraganas. That Suit has been filed against the petitioner by the respondent.

(2.) If the petitioner feels that the subject matter of that Suit pending in the Court of 2nd Civil Judge. (Junior Division) at Alipore 24-Parganas (South) is covered by an arbitration agreement existing between the parties, it is open to the petitioner to approach that Court in terms of Sec. 8 of the Act for such appropriate directions and orders as may be permissible under law. This court cannot exercise jurisdiction tinder Sec. 8 of the Act in the present application. Perhaps the petitioner has grossly mis-construed Sec. 8 of the Act, and thus wrongly approached this court.

(3.) Sec. 8 reads as under :