(1.) This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 17.4.98 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby and whereunder the writ application filed by the respondent No. 7 was disposed directing, "Since the panel sent by the school authorities to the District Inspector of Schools concerned on 30.9.97 is still lying undisposed of by the District Inspector of Schools concerned for reasons best known to him, though under the relevant Rules he is to dispose of the panel within thirty days from the date of receipt of such panel, it should be deemed that the panel was duly prepared by the school authorities and there is no legal impediment to approve the said panel. Accordingly, the District Inspector of Schools concerned is directed to accord approval of the said panel, positively within a period of font weeks from the date of communication of this order".
(2.) Mr. Ali, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, has, Inter alia, drawn this Court's attention to the statements made in Paragraph 7 of the stay application which is to the following effect "-
(3.) The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on the other band submitted that the writ petitioner's appointment has already been approved and she had joined the school. However, it has been stated at the Bar that the approval granted by the District Inspector of Schools is a conditional one.