HINDUSTHAN STEEL LIMITED Vs. PRIYABRATA BOSE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an application made by the Defendants excepting the Defendants Nos. 6, 46, 55, 74, 75, 76, 77/ 86, 88, 95 and 96 in this suit for, inter alia, an order of injunction restraining the Plaintiff, its officers, servants and agents from giving any effect or any further effects to the two notices both dated March 31, 1969, or from in any way acting upon the said notices or enforcing the same. This application has been made in the suit filed by the Plaintiff. The suit was filed by the Plaintiff, inter alia, for an injunction restraining the Defendants from committing acts of nuisances alleged in the plaint at the Plaintiff's office at No. 13 Camac Street, Calcutta (in protest against alleged acts of victimization by the Plaintiff by transferring the Defendants Nos. 1 to 4 to Rourkela). The Defendants Nos. 1 to 4 are the office -bearers of the union of the employees of the Plaintiff. After instituting the suit the Plaintiff made an application for an order of temporary injunction restraining the Defendants in the suit from committing the acts of trespasses and nuisances mentioned in the said petition. Upon the said application on or about February 11, 1969, an ex parte order was made restraining the Defendants from watching and besetting or causing or procuring for watching and besetting the entrances or approaches of the said building or the said office or preventing the employees, the managerial staff and the customers of the Plaintiff from approaching or entering the said office of the said building or to prevent them from working therein or intimidating or coercing the employees, the managerial staff and the customers of the Plaintiff or obstructing the entrances and approaches of the said office and the said building or interfering with the use and the enjoyment of the said office by the Plaintiff or forming or causing to form unlawful assemblies in front of the office or the said building or holding or causing demonstration except 25 yards away from the entrance of the said office.

(2.) On the returnable date of the said motion the said ex parte ad interim order passed by me on February 11, 1969, was modified as follows:

(3.) At the final hearing of the said application on March 18, 1969, I passed the following order: