LAWS(CAL)-1959-7-1

JATINDRA NATH SET Vs. JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY

Decided On July 23, 1959
JATINDRA NATH SET Appellant
V/S
JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an application by Jatindra Nath Set, who is a life member of the National Council of Education, against the Jadavpur University, the Secretary, National Council of Education and the State of West Bengal. The application is made under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of mandamus directing the Jadavpur University and the State of West Bengal to forbear from taking over the management and maintenance of any institution under the control of the National Council of Education or from taking over any assets covered by any deed of gift, endowment, bequest or trust in favour of such National Council of Education.

(2.) The National Council of Education conjures up the memory of a chapter in the history of national education in India during the period of her struggle for emancipation against foreign rule. It was founded by men inspired by partiotism and national ideals as early as 1906. The object was to impart education, literal, scientific as well as technical and professjonal and emphasis was on the national ideals. It was thought at the time that the than existing universities were anti-national and were not suited to educate Indians to be true to their national genius and cultural heritage. The National Council of Education was a great example of creative achievement of the historic Swadeshi movement in the State of Bengal. More than half a century has passed and the gallery of time is packed with the relics of ideals achieved and broken. Great changes have come on the political and constitutional horizon of India. The scene has changed. The application represents a conflict and a struggle between the old atmosphere and the new atmosphere, between the old sense of struggle and the new environment of emancipation.

(3.) The Jadavpur University Act, 1955, is challenged as ultra vires. Mr. Mukunda Behari Mullick, the learned Advocate for the applicant first criticises this Act as a measure of bad faith. He draws my attention to that portion of the statement of objects and reasons published in the Calcutta Gazette Extraordinary of August 31, 1955, Part IV A at page 1432, where the Minister -- Member-in-Charge, made the following statement: