(1.) The appeal is not only unmeritorious but it borders on the absurd. It is incomprehensible as to how two sets of parties engaged in an adversarial litigation without the defendant asking the plaint to be thrown out since it did not disclose any claim which could be pursued and was ex facie barred by the laws of limitation.
(2.) It was a complete waste of time that two witnesses were examined by the plaintiff and another two by the defendant bank before the money claim was defeated on the ground of limitation.
(3.) The voluminous plaint runs into some 50 pages or so. Paragraph 37 of the plaint is of relevance: