SRI JOYDEB DEBNATH Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is pursuant to the direction given on 08.04.19 fixing the matter for hearing in connection with a CRAN application 935 of 2019 seeking clarification of the order dated 8.02.19 passed in CRR No. 307 of 2019.

(2.) The opposite party wanted an opportunity of hearing, and upon consideration of which, this Court directed petitioner to serve copy of application including the revisional application upon the opposite parities.

(3.) Learned Sessions Judge Alipore, 24 Parganas (South) cancelled the bail on 18th January, 2019. Admittedly in this case the petitioner/revisionist was granted anticipatory bail. There was an observation of the learned Sessions Judge, while granting anticipatory bail that "if the petitioner/accused is enlarged on regular bail, the regular bail may be cancelled if the petitioner/accused fails to meet the reasonable demand made by the informent to come to a settlement for dissolution of marriage on mutual consent". The contention raised by the learned advocate for opposite party is that petitioner already failed to comply with the condition by meeting the reasonable demand made by the de facto complainant/wife to come to a settlement for dissolution of marriage on mutual consent.