REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Rita Bhattacharjee Appellant

V/S

Jyotirmoy Mukherjee Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

APURBA MOHAN GHOSE V. MANASHI GHOSE [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SINGHARA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR KERBA JADHAV VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
HARIDWAR SINGH VS. BAGUN SUMBRUI [REFERRED TO]
MURLIDHAR AGGARWAL MURLIDHAR AGGARWAL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHS:RAM AGYAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
BADRI PRASAD JAGAN PRASAD VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX U P LUCKNOW [REFERRED TO]
LEENA ROY VS. SUBRATO ROY [REFERRED TO]
SURESHTA DEVI VS. OM PRAKASH [REFERRED TO]
PAYAL JINDAL VS. A K JINDAL [REFERRED TO]
SANDHYA RANI V. KALYANRAM [REFERRED TO]
SNEH PRABHA VS. RAVINDER KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
RADHA VS. MOHINDER KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
KANCHAN DEVI VS. PROMOD KUMAR MITTAL [REFERRED TO]
ANITA SABHARWAL V. ANIL SABHARWAL [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK HURRA ASHOK HURRA VS. RUPABIPINZAVERI:RUPA ASHOK HURRA [REFERRED TO]
MADHURI MEHTA VS. MEET VERMA [REFERRED TO]
SHASHI GARG VS. ARUN GARG [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. PRAKASH CHAND [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY LAXMI SADHO VS. JAGDISH [REFERRED TO]
ASHA DEVI VS. CHATURDAS [REFERRED TO]
ANJANA KISHORE VS. PUNEET KISHORE [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI VS. ANJUM M H GHASWALA [REFERRED TO]
VASANT GANESH DAMLE VS. SHRIKANT TRIMBAK DATAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. BALARAM SAHU [REFERRED TO]
BALWANT SINGH VS. ANAND KUMAR SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
HARPIT SINGH ANAND VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
SWATI VERMA VS. RAJAN VERMA [REFERRED TO]
NAVEEN KOHLI VS. NEELU KOHLI [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN BANK VS. ABS MARINE PRODUCTS PVT LTD [REFERRED TO]
SANGHAMITRA GHOSH VS. KAJAL KUMAR GHOSH [REFERRED TO]
SOHAN LAL VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
GOUTAM BASU VS. NINA BASU [REFERRED TO]
JIMMY SUDARSHAN PUROHIT VS. SUDARSHAN SHARAD PUROHIT [REFERRED TO]
KULWINDER KAUR VS. JAGDISH SINGH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE two applications were heard analogously as common questions of laws are involved herein. These two applications have been filed by the parties to two different matrimonial appeals pending in this court thereby praying for granting divorce on mutual consent.

(2.) THE question that primarily arises for determination in these applications is whether in a pending appeal against the dismissal of a suit for divorce on the grounds specified in Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the parties to such proceedings, instead of filing a fresh application under Section 13B of the Act before the learned District Court, can file such an application and insist on passing a decree for divorce on mutual consent without waiting for six months as provided in Section 13B(2) of the Act.

(3.) IN order to appreciate the contentions of the learned counsel for the parties, it will be appropriate to refer to the provisions contained in Section 13B of the Act which are quoted below :

Click here to view full judgment.

RITA BHATTACHARJEE Vs. JYOTIRMOY MUKHERJEE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address