REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

STATE BANK OF INDIA Appellant

V/S

SHYAMAL KUMAR MUKHERJEE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

RANJIT KR. DE CHOWDHURY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
KALYAN SINGH 1 SARDAR SINGH IN PETN NO 180 OF 61 2 LAL SINGH IN PETN NO 181 OF 61 AND 3 BHARAT RAJ SINGH IN PETN NO 205 OF 61 PETITIONERS VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHS :STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MANI SUBRAT JAIN VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
K L TRIPATHI VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. A LAKSHMIKUTTY [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAMA TEWARI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR ECIL HYDERABAD VS. B KARUNAKAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF PATIALA VS. S K SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF PATIALA VS. S K SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. THIRUK V PERUMAL [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
M C MEHTA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY VS. MANSOOR ALI KHAN [REFERRED TO]
VINAY KUMAR VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. HARENDRA ARORA [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR OF SETTLEMENTS A P VS. M R APPARAO [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD VS. P C CHATURVEDI [REFERRED TO]
SYNDICATE BANK VS. VENKATESH GURURAO KURATI [REFERRED TO]
PANDIT D AHER VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS. KAILASH CHANDRA AHUJA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGING the interim order dated 1st August, 2003 passed in writ application no. 11117 (W) of 2003 whereby and whereunder learned trial Judge restrained the respondents from proceeding further with the disciplinary proceeding without supplying the writ petitioner the copies of the documents as prayed for, this appeal was preferred by State Bank of India and Ors. The interim order against which this appeal arose reads such:

(2.) BY the order dated 26th August, 2004, the Division Bench (Coram: hon'ble Justice Altamas Kabir (as His Lordship then was) and Hon'ble Justice asit Kumar Bisi (as His Lordship then was)) directed the appellant-bank to pay the subsistence allowance and on consent of the parties passed a direction for hearing of the writ application along with the appeal, by considering the application for recalling of order dated 17th May, 2004 as filed in the appeal. The order dated 26th August, 2004, reads such:

(3.) IN pursuance thereof, parties filed their respective affidavits of the writ application and stay application. Paper Books filed annexing all papers.

Click here to view full judgment.

STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. SHYAMAL KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address