REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

CHAMELI SINGHA Appellant

V/S

SHAM SUNDAR NAG Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BIJAN BEHARI BHATTACHARYYA V. KRISHNA PRAKASH MITRA [REFERRED TO]
SM. BEDANA DEVI AND ORS. V. ABDUL JAWAB [REFERRED TO]
NIRODE GOPAL BHATTACHARYYA V. BELA KUNDU [REFERRED TO]
PRASUN KUMAR SEN V. NEMAI CHAND BHATTACHARYA [REFERRED TO]
SOURENDRA NATH RUDRA V ASHIM KUMAR BHATTACHARJEE AND ORS [REFERRED TO]
WEST BENGAL PROVINCIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD V. SAILENDRA NATH GHOSH AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
TRILOK CHANDRA JAIN V. HIRENDRA KUMAR MITTER AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
SIBAPADA ROY V. SUDHANGSU KUMAR SEN [REFERRED TO]
VENKATARAMANA DEVARU STATE OF MYSORE VS. STATE OF MYSORE:VENKATARAMANA DEVARU [REFERRED TO]
B BANERJEE KAMAL LAL GHOSAL VS. ANITA PAN:ENA DUTTA [REFERRED TO]
HASMAT RAI VS. RAGHUNATH PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
BABA KASHINATH BHINGE VS. SAMAST LINGAYAT GAVALI [REFERRED TO]
ADHIR KUMAR DAS VS. JUTHIKA SEN [REFERRED TO]
BANKA BEHARI DUTT VS. GOUR MOHAN DUTTA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The tenant-defendant has preferred this appeal against a judgment and decree dated 29th November, 1982 passed by Sri H.Kar, Judge, 2nd Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Ejectment Suit No. 271/79 whereby and whereunder the said suit was decreed.

(2.) The plaintiff-respondent filed the aforementioned suit against the appellant, inter alia, on the ground of personal necessity. The plea of personal necessity has been taken in paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the plaint, which read thus :-

(3.) The appellant in her written statement denied and disputed the said allegations made in the plaint. Upon the aforementioned pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed :-

Click here to view full judgment.

CHAMELI SINGHA Vs. SHAM SUNDAR NAG

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address