LAWS(CAL)-1978-4-52

G B BANERJEE Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Decided On April 05, 1978
G.B.BANERJEE Appellant
V/S
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This reference under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, relates to the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72 and the relevant accounting years are the financial years ended on March 31, 1970, and March 31, 1971, respectively. The question involved before us is as follows: "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the income from the trust property is includible in the total income of the assessee ?"

(2.) The assessee is an individual. By a deed of indenture dated March 5, 1962, the assessee settled his property at 35A, Badan Roy Lane, in trust for the benefit of his wife and children. Under the said deed, the trustees were directed to pay the income of the said trust property to the assessee's wife during her lifetime and thereafter to his children after meeting the outgoings like rates, taxes, etc. The assessee continued to live in the said property. For the first time in the assessment years under reference the assessee claimed that the income from the said property should not be included in his total income. It was found by the ITO that all along in the past the income from the said property was included in the total income of the assessee and that the assessee, in fact, enjoyed the rent from the said property up to the assessment year 1966-67. In this view of the matter, he included "the value of the dwelling house" of Rs. 2,534 and Rs. 1,681, respectively, in the total income of the assessee for the two years under reference.

(3.) An appeal was preferred before the AAC by the assessee. It was argued that it was of no importance whether the assessee had previously claimed deduction of the value of the dwelling house or not. It was contended that since the assessee had created an irrevocable trust in respect of the said property, the ITO was not justified in including the income from the said property in the total income of the assessee. Upholding the contentions of the appellant, the AAC, while deleting the aforesaid sums from the total income of the assessee observed as under: