(1.) The only ground urged by the appellants is that the Single Bench did not embark on any meaningful inquiry as to whether the first appellant was amenable to the writ jurisdiction before deciding the matter on merits.
(2.) It is evident from the order impugned dated November 25, 2016 that the question of maintainability was squarely raised and it was observed in course of the order that such issue "requires consideration".
(3.) The extent of consideration is evident from the immediate following paragraphs: