UNITED BANK OF INDIA Vs. ANJALI MUKHERJEE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE application for leave to appeal is granted. Re: An appln. for condonation of delay (CAN 2011/07).

(2.) WE have heard the learned Counsel for the appellants. Considering the averments made in the application we are satisfied that sufficient reasons have been given by the applicant for condoning the delay of 74 days in preferring the appeal. The delay is accordingly condoned. The application for condonation of delay is allowed. Re: An appln. for leave to Stay (CAN 2012/2007)

(3.) PURSUANT to the aforesaid order, the Bank considered the claim of the petitioner Soumen Mukherjee, who was petitioner No. 2 in the Writ petition being W.P. No. 18788 (W)of 2003. The decision was communicated to the aforesaid petitioner on 8th August, 2006 which reads as follows: Re: Application for appointment in the Bank. In response to your above application you were interviewed on 21st July, 2006 by the Interview Committee constituted for the purpose of considering appointment in the bank in subordinate cadre. You were not found suitable for appointment in the Bank by the said Interview Committee which please note.