(1.) The petitioner in WP No. 007 of 2008 has filed this appeal feeling aggrieved by the order dated April 02, 2008 disposing of the writ petition. The order dated April 02, 2008 is set out below:
(2.) Mr Biswas, counsel for the appellant, submits that though there was no order staying the operation of the order dated April 02, 2008, the respondents have taken no steps to give the decision in compliance with the direction given by the order dated April 02, 2008.
(3.) Ms Nag, counsel for the respondents, submits that the respondents were and still are ready to comply with the direction, but they did not give the appropriate decision in compliance with the direction because of pendency of this appeal. She says that within six weeks from date the respondents shall give appropriate reasoned decision in compliance with the direction given by the order dated April 02, 2008.