MANORANJAN SAMADDAR Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal and heard Mr. Roy Chowdhury and Mr. Basu in this matter. We are of the view that the order of the learned Tribunal does not call for any interference on the basis of materials placed before the learned Tribunal for the reasons stated hereunder.

(2.) THE applicant through intervention of the Court got the order of promotion from the post of Excise Constable to the post of Assistant Sub -Inspector of the Excise Department. After haying obtained the order of promotion, the applicant claimed for ante dating of the promotion, at least at par with Sri Bijay Kumar Bittal and Amarendranath Mandal, who were described by the applicant to be juniors in the order of promotion.

(3.) AFTER considering all the aspects of the matter, learned Single Judge found that Sri Bijay Kumar Bittal as well as said Amarendranath Mandal were seniors to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, the said matter was disposed of ultimately by passing the following order: This order is passed without prejudice to the rights of the writ petitioner to make representation with regard to his claim for seniority on any other ground before the respondent Excise Commissioner arid if such representation is made the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the same according to law.