LAWS(CAL)-1967-2-23

RAMJI GOKUL Vs. HARI LAL JETHA

Decided On February 17, 1967
Ramji Gokul Appellant
V/S
Hari Lal Jetha Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is a suit on a promissory note for the recovery of the sum of Rs. 13,614 -6 -3 p.

(2.) The suit has been contested on behalf of the Defendants only on the ground that this Court has no jurisdiction to try and entertain this suit. Although in the written statement various other defences had been taken, Mr. S. Sinha, learned Advocate for the Defendants, has submitted at the trial that the Defendants are not pressing any of the other defences raised in the written statement and are contesting the suit only on the question of jurisdiction. Mr. Sinha has further stipulated that if it be held that this Court has jurisdiction, a decree for the amount claimed by the Plaintiff in this suit has to follow.

(3.) No oral evidence has been adduced on behalf of the parties at the trial. Documentary evidence has been adduced and by consent of the parties the brief of documents has been tendered in the suit and the admitted brief has been marked as Ex. 1.