REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Santilata Mitter Appellant

V/S

Kartick Kumar Dhur Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BALAJI ANANT V/S. GANESH JANARDAN [REFERRED TO]
RAJANIKANTH BISWAS V/S. RAM NATH NEOGY [REFERRED TO]
YELUMALAI CHETTI V/S. SRINIVASA CHETTI [REFERRED TO]
KISHORI MOHUN ROY CHOWDHURY V/S. CHUNDER NATH PAL [REFERRED TO]
SARVI BEGAM V/S. TAJ BEGAM [REFERRED TO]
GIRIJA KANTA CHAKRABARTY V/S. MOHIM CHANDRA ACHARJYA [REFERRED TO]
SUDARSHAN DAS V/S. BIRAJA SUNDARI DASI [REFERRED TO]
SIDHESHWAR MUKHERJEE VS. BHUBAESHWAR PRASAD NARAIN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
MATHURI SURYANJANEYALU VS. THUMMALASETTO VENKATESWARLU [REFERRED TO]
POODIPEDDI LAXMINARASAMMA VS. GADA RANGANAYAKAMMA [REFERRED TO]
PETHAPERUMAL AMBALAM VS. CHIDAMBARAM CHETTIAR [REFERRED TO]
HARAKH SONAR VS. GOPI KISHUN [REFERRED TO]
V.C.THANI CHETTIAR VS. DAKSHINAMURTHY MUDALIAR [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an application under Order 21, Rule 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Defendant Kartick Kumar Dhur is the judgment -debtor in a mortgage decree in respect of the undivided half share in the premises No. 32B, Brindaban Bysack Street, Calcutta. The final decree was passed on August 17, 1960. The sale order was made. The Petitioner Ginia Debi was declared the highest bidder at a price of Rs. 24,000. The Petitioner paid the entire purchase money. On September 28, 1965, the sale was confirmed. The sale certificate had been duly granted in favour of the Petitioner.

(2.) The property was sold, inter alia, on the following conditions of sale:

(3.) The other undivided half share of the property had also been purchased by the Petitioner on October 9, 1964, from the United Bank of India Ltd. which was the mortgagee -purchaser of the share of Kartick's brother Aukhoy under the mortgage -decree passed in a different suit.

Click here to view full judgment.

SANTILATA MITTER Vs. KARTICK KUMAR DHUR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address