REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Sheikh Abdus Sadek Appellant

V/S

Sheikh Abdul Mukim Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

ABDUL RASHID ABDULLA KHAN MUSALMAN V. DR. SYED MINHAZUL HASAN NAIWUDDIN MUSALMAN AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
FAQUIR MOHAMMAA V. HASAN KHAN [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA PAL VS. SARASWATI ARORA [REFERRED TO]
INDU BALA BOSE VS. MANINDRA CHANDRA BOSE [REFERRED TO]
CHIRANJILAL SHRILAL GOENKA VS. JASJIT SINGH [REFERRED TO]
JAYAMMA VS. MARIA BAI DEAD [REFERRED TO]
BENGA BEHERA VS. BRAJA KISHORE NANDA [REFERRED TO]
KANWARJIT SINGH DHILLON VS. HARDYAL SINGH DHILLON [REFERRED TO]
KANWARJIT SINGH DHILLON VS. HARDYAL SINGH DHILLON [REFERRED TO]
SHEHAMMAL VS. HASAN KHANI RAWTHER [REFERRED TO]
BEGUM SHANTI TUFAIL AHMAD KHAN VS. JALAUDDIN S O BADRUDDIN [REFERRED TO]
DHANE ALIA MIA VS. SOBHAN ALI [REFERRED TO]
AMMU BALACHANDRAN VS. U T JOSEPH DIED [REFERRED TO]
RAI SATYENDRA NATH SEN BAHADUR VS. NARENDRA NATH GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
MAHOMED HUSSEIN HAJI GULAM MAHOMED AJAM VS. AISHABAI [REFERRED TO]
KA RIVERRETTA DIENGDOH VS. KA TRIALLY SARA RYMBAI [REFERRED TO]
ANARALI TARAFDAR VS. OMAR ALI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this testamentary suit, the plaintiff seeks probate of the last Will and testament of the deceased Nurun Nahar dated April 11, 2007.

(2.) The plaintiff is the executor of the Will dated April 11, 2007. The Will is of a Mahomedan lady. The testatrix had died on March 10, 2008 at her residence. The grant of the probate is contested by one of the sons of the deceased. In the affidavit in support of the caveat the defendant has alleged that, the bequest is void under Mahomedan Law.

(3.) The probate proceeding was set down as a contentious cause. The parties have adduced evidence through commission.

Click here to view full judgment.

SHEIKH ABDUS SADEK Vs. SHEIKH ABDUL MUKIM

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address