DULAL NATH Vs. MUKTARAM NASKAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) FOR alleged violation of an interim order in Civil Rule No. 622 (W) of 1905, there was an order for payment of costs, assessed at 20 gold, mohuis, made on january 18, 1966, against respondent no. 1, Muktaram Naskar and in favour of the present petitioners named Dulal nath and Kalinath. The costs have not been, it is said, paid by the respondent no. 1 abovenamed.

(2.) THE instant application is one for transfer of the order for payment of costs, to the third court of the munsif at Basirhat for execution by that court, on the ground that the respondent no. 1 judgment-deb tor resides and has properties within the jurisdiction of the third court of the Munsif at Basirhat. Now, under section 39 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

(3.) THE procedure to be adopted in cases where the court desires that its own decrees shall be executed by another court is to be found in order 21, rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.