KRISHNAMOY GIRI Vs. LAKSHMI RANI PAUL & ORS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) If some of the stands on the same footing and if few of them have been taken off from the category of the defendants, the other defendants should not be treated differently.

(2.) Admittedly the petitioner did not challenge the said order by moving higher up. Similar application was taken out by the defendant no. 4, which was disposed of by passing the impugned order in the same line and tune with the order dated 21st April, 2014. The moment the petitioner realizes that the order dated 21st April, 2014 have played an important and vital role in adjudication of an application filed by the defendant no. 3, an application for recalling of the said order is taken out, which according to the learned advocate for the petitioner is still pending before the Trial Court.

(3.) The fact remains that the said order has not been recalled as yet by the Trial Court. Many things are said by the learned advocate for the petitioner on the recalling application, which this Court feels not to go into the merit of the same, as the matter is subjudice before the Trial Court and any observations so made herein may have some persuasive effect in deciding the said application.